![]() ![]() It is sometimes difficult to get really uniform and controlled sample images of the same subject – especially when shooting naturally (so no indoor, well controlled, studio space). Where the lenses really start to diverge from another is in the outputted quality of the image. Still, any respectable photographer would be able to manage more than well with an f/1.8 aperture lens. Of course, in terms of the actual apertures, they are actually fairly similar – though the more expensive lens provides a few additional stops lower at f/1.2 vs. ![]() These are not necessarily indicators of quality, but the larger lens and weightier feel gives the impression that there is more going on in the more expensive lens – which is too be expected. ![]() In terms of sheer size (it’s double or triple the size just looking at them) and weight (one of these is light, one of these is heavy, can you guess which is which?). Anyone who looks at the lenses and holds them side by side will notice that the nifty fifty feels like a child’s lens when compared with the EF 50mm f/1.2. Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM lensĪside from the already mentioned difference in price, there are a few obvious differences just from a spec point of view (we promise not to bore you too much here!). Comparison: Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM lens vs. ![]() We’re here to give you a breakdown on the value it adds for us, in particular in how it compares to that much more inexpensive lens. Still, there has to be a significant reason to want to make the jump from a kit lens that is $125 to jumping to a Canon prime lens that runs around $1,300. Not to mention, the longer the focal length, the farther you have to be from your subject – which doesn’t mesh well with our style of photography when capturing couples or family portraits. On the other side of things, longer focal lengths like the 85mm, 135mm, or 70-200mm zoomable lens (all of which we regularly use) have beautiful image quality, but in some scenarios can be too tight to work with depending on the space. Wide angle lenses like a 24mm are excellent for capturing environments and large scenes (and in our own use cases – sometimes capturing some really unique, albeit contorted, portraits) – but that contortion + amount of information being absorbed by shooting with a wide angle is sometimes too much. Most other lenses have their own value to add to a shoot. With that said, we do still keep the old “nifty fifty” (as it is called…) around in case we have a unique instance we want to shoot with it.Īs a general statement, the 50mm is one of our favorites mostly due to the flexibility it provides when shooting. Even as we expanded our business, the quality of even the kit 50mm lens (this one being the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM lens) was actually impressive, and led to us utilizing it as we grew our collection of lenses until we finally decided to upgrade to the Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM. Much of our early photography growing up was centered around a 50mm kit lens that came along with more inexpensive, beginner camera bodies like the Canon Rebel. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |